Wednesday, October 7, 2009

John F. Nash, 1928


John F. Nash, 1928-

When the 21-year old John Nash wrote his 27-page dissertation outlining his "Nash Equilibrium" for strategic non-cooperative games, the impact was enormous। On the formal side, his existence proof was one of the first applications of Kakutani's fixed-point theorem later employed with so much gusto by
Neo-Walrasians everywhere; on the conceptual side, he spawned much of the literature on non-cooperative game theory which has since grown at a prodigious rate - threatening, some claim, to overwhelm much of economics itself.
When the young Nash had applied to graduate school at Princeton in 1948, his old Carnegie Tech professor, R.J. Duffin, wrote only one line on his letter of recommendation: "This man is a genius". It was at Princeton that Nash encountered the theory of games, then recently launched by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern. However, they had only managed to solve non-cooperative games in the case of "pure rivalries" (i.e. zero-sum). The young Nash turned to rivalries with mutual gain. His trick was the use of best-response functions and a recent theorem that had just emerged - Kakutani's fixed point-theorem. His main result, the "Nash Equilibrium", was published in 1950 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. He followed this up with a paper which introduced yet another solution concept - this time for two-person cooperative games - the "Nash Bargaining Solution" (NBS) in 1950. A 1951 paper attached his name to yet another side of economics - this time, the "Nash Programme", reflecting his methodological call for the reduction of all cooperative games into a non-cooperative framework.
His contributions to mathematics were no less remarkable. As an undergraduate, he had inadvertently (and independently) proved Brouwer's fixed point theorem. Later on, he went on to break one of Riemann's most perplexing mathematical conundrums. From then on, Nash provided breakthrough after breakthrough in mathematics.
In 1958, on the threshold of his career, Nash got struck by paranoid schizophrenia. He lost his job at M.I.T. in 1959 (he had been tenured there in 1958 - at the age of 29) and was virtually incapicated by the disease for the next two decades or so. He roamed about Europe and America, finally, returning to Princeton where he became a sad, ghostly character on the campus - "the Phantom of Fine Hall" as Rebecca Goldstein described him in her novel, Mind-Body Problem.
The disease began to evaporate in the early 1970s and Nash began to gradually to return to his work in mathematics. However, Nash himself associated his madness with his living on an "ultralogical" plane, "breathing air too rare" for most mortals, and if being "cured" meant he could no longer do any original work at that level, then, Nash argued, a remission might not be worthwhile in the end. As John Dryden once put it:
Great wits are sure to madness near allied,And thin partitions do their bounds divide.
(John Dryden, Absalom

New Gravity

New Gravity - Redefining our
perception

Here's an interesting view - There is no such thing as gravity! While that seems absurd (everyone knows and experiences gravity 24/7) the truth is that we observe "a behavior" which we have defined as gravity. When I drop a ball, it falls to earth, but is it actually being attracted to earth? Is there actually a force pulling the 2 masses toward each other?When I light a match is there a force that pushes the heat away from the head of the match? No. We know the match head will eventually get cooler and the heat will dissipate. We describe this behavior as complying with the second law of thermodynamics - entropy (seeking equilibrium). Equally, an ice cube eventually melts and the water heats to room temperature.This phenomenon is the primary force of the universe and the origin of the force we call gravity. To get to this conclusion we need to roll back the clock to the beginning of our known universe - The big bang. Who knows what started the whole thing off, but we now have a pretty good idea as to the sequence of events that shaped our present universe. (We've worked it backwards).In the beginning there was what I call vacuous space. It was in equilibrium. There was no matter and no energy. Then came the big bang. A sea of liquid "plasma" energy. There was no matter, just hot, dense liquid energy in "vacuous" space.This energy immediately began filling the vacuous space. (We have no experience with void space. It only exists at the outer boundary of the expanding universe). The only concept I can imagine is that of a tornado. A tornado spinning so fast that the center becomes totally void of everything. No matter, no energy. However, once energy is drawn into the tornado's vortex, it's filled. This is the process that takes place as the universe expands and fills vacuous space.This rapid expansion caused the density and temperature of the liquid energy universe to drop until the liquid energy began "a phase change". Solid energy in the form of neutrons and charge coupled protons/electrons precipitated from the liquid energy. Eventually the temperature of the energy plasma dropped below the transition temperature. At this point all of the solid energy (neutrons and protons/electrons) had been formed.Here's where it gets interesting. The universe began as liquid energy then transitioned into solid energy and "gaseous" energy.The universe continued to expand filling the vacuous space with "gaseous" energy and solid energy which we call matter. Because solid and gaseous energy are the same thing they can't occupy the same space at the same time. The "gaseous" form of energy surrounds and pushes (uniformly) on neutrons and protons. Gravity is caused by the "shadowing" effect of the non-solid energy (which fills the universe) pushing against the solid neutrons and protons.The math is exactly the same. The vector forces are identical. The only difference is that it's not an attractive force; it's the sum of forces "pushing" neutrons and protons toward each other. This is why the more neutrons and protons, the greater the gravitational force.
at the center becomes totally void of everything. No matter, no energy. However, once energy is drawn into the tornado's vortex, it's filled. This is the process that takes place as the universe expands and fills vacuous space.This rapid expansion caused the density and temperature of the liquid energy universe to drop until the liquid energy began "a phase change". Solid energy in the form of neutrons and charge coupled protons/electrons precipitated from the liquid energy. Eventually the temperature of the energy plasma dropped below the transition temperature. At this point all of the solid energy (neutrons and protons/electrons) had been formed.Here's where it gets interesting. The universe began as liquid energy then transitioned into solid energy and "gaseous" energy.The universe continued to expand filling the vacuous space with "gaseous" energy and solid energy which we call matter. Because solid and gaseous energy are the same thing they can't occupy the same space at the same time. The "gaseous" form of energy surrounds and pushes (uniformly) on neutrons and protons. Gravity is caused by the "shadowing" effect of the non-solid energy (which fills the universe) pushing against the solid neutrons and protons.The math is exactly the same. The vector forces are identical. The only difference is that it's not an attractive force; it's the sum of forces "pushing" neutrons and protons toward each other. This is why the more neutrons and protons, the greater the gravitational force
.
but CAN WE SAY it's the last theory obout

GRAVITY?????